Thus, alongside the progress made during the Industrial Revolution, the class structure divides into two major sects, those who own businesses and resources and those who rely on the owners for their livelihood. A conflict perspective is also useful for studying gender inequality. Revolution Philosophy of Education: You are implying that sex serves the SOLE purpose of reproduction in humans. It explores the determinants and consequences of social phenomena in terms of
For the upper classes, this means they are able to exploit the lower classes even more.
Gay Marriage: The Social Issue (Application of two sociology perspectives)
Evolutionary Psychology is just a gray area for debate, and "bridges" the gap between biology and psychology. A conflict perspective assumes that there is an unequal distribution of power within a society. What you stated was common in the 70's. Men are on average larger and physically stronger than women and have often used their strength to keep women in inferior positions within society by labeling them as weak. Do you really think gays are going to stop being gay if you prevent same-sex marriages??? It is not illegal for "single" people to adopt children you know. Do husbands and wives have sex as much as possible and attempt to produce as many children as possible???
Conflict theory provides a helpful theoretical framework for researchers and activists who try to explain why certain populations fare worse than others and to develop ways to help underprivileged groups. However, members of the working and lower classes often continue to work the same number of hours, try to find multiple jobs to make ends meet, and are less likely to receive protection and benefits from their employers. When Science and Fait Women have also been sexually exploited and treated as property to be owned by men. Until then, a system of fighting perspectives is the closest thing we can get. You are implying that sex serves the SOLE purpose of reproduction in humans. Evolutionary Psychology is just a gray area for debate, and "bridges" the gap between biology and psychology.