However, while the Constitution may prevent the government from censoring controversial works of erotic fiction, it does not prevent payment processors from shutting off the accounts of legal publishers. But we believe that intermediaries —like ISPs, registrars, payment providers, search engines, and even platforms for user-generated content like Facebook—are most valuable when they serve as neutral platforms. A fight over unmasking an anonymous Reddit commenter has turned into a significant win for online speech and fair use. Don't fill out this field required. The UK government sought public feedback on proposals to update its financial regulations pertaining to money laundering and terrorism in alignment with a larger European By Kurt Opsahl and rainey Reitman.
The TCPA has been one of the strongest laws
Follow EFF: Email updates on news, actions, events in your area, and more. To be clear, payment providers as well as other intermediaries have their own First Amendment rights not to carry speech with which they disagree. Similar to Smashwords, Nifty Archives ran into trouble because it provides an online space for controversial erotic fiction.
Media widely reported last fall that a